Module System — Agda 2.7.0 documentation (2025)

Module application¶

Anonymous modules¶

Basics¶

First let us introduce some terminology. A definition is a syntactic construction defining an entity such as a function or a datatype. A name is a string used to identify definitions. The same definition can have many names and at different points in the program it will have different names. It may also be the case that two definitions have the same name. In this case there will be an error if the name is used.

The main purpose of the module system is to structure the way names are used in a program. This is done by organising the program in an hierarchical structure of modules where each module contains a number of definitions and submodules. For instance,

module Main where module B where f : Nat → Nat f n = suc n g : Nat → Nat → Nat g n m = m

Note that we use indentation to indicate which definitions are part of a module. In the example f is in the module Main.B and g is in Main. How to refer to a particular definition is determined by where it is located in the module hierarchy. Definitions from an enclosing module are referred to by their given names as seen in the type of f above. To access a definition from outside its defining module a qualified name has to be used.

module Main₂ where module B where f : Nat → Nat f n = suc n ff : Nat → Nat ff x = B.f (B.f x)

To be able to use the short names for definitions in a module the module has to be opened.

module Main₃ where module B where f : Nat → Nat f n = suc n open B ff : Nat → Nat ff x = f (f x)

If A.qname refers to a definition d, then after open A, qname will also refer to d. Note that qname can itself be a qualified name. Opening a module only introduces new names for a definition, it never removes the old names. The policy is to allow the introduction of ambiguous names, but give an error if an ambiguous name is used.

Modules can also be opened within a local scope by putting the open B within a where clause:

ff₁ : Nat → Natff₁ x = f (f x) where open B

Private definitions¶

To make a definition inaccessible outside its defining module it can be declared private. A private definition is treated as a normal definition inside the module that defines it, but outside the module the definition has no name. In a dependently type setting there are some problems with private definitions—since the type checker performs computations, private names might show up in goals and error messages. Consider the following (contrived) example

module Main₄ where module A where private IsZero’ : Nat → Set IsZero’ zero = ⊤ IsZero’ (suc n) = ⊥ IsZero : Nat → Set IsZero n = IsZero’ n open A prf : (n : Nat) → IsZero n prf n = ?

The type of the goal ?0 is IsZero n which normalises to IsZero’ n. The question is how to display this normal form to the user. At the point of ?0 there is no name for IsZero’. One option could be try to fold the term and print IsZero n. This is a very hard problem in general, so rather than trying to do this we make it clear to the user that IsZero’ is something that is not in scope and print the goal as ;Main₄.A.IsZero’ n. The leading semicolon indicates that the entity is not in scope. The same technique is used for definitions that only have ambiguous names.

In effect using private definitions means that, from the user’s perspective, we do not have subject reduction. This is just an illusion, however—the type checker has full access to all definitions.

Name modifiers¶

An alternative to making definitions private is to exert finer control over what names are introduced when opening a module. This is done by qualifying an open (or open import or module X (args : Args) = ...) statement with one or more of the modifiers using, hiding, or renaming.

• using is followed by a list of identifiers, separated by semicolons, and has the effect of introducing only those identifiers and the ones named in the renaming clause,

• hiding is equally followed by a list of identifiers, separated by semicolons, and has the effect of introducing all identifiers but the ones named in the hiding clause,

  See Also

  What Is The Yield To Maturity For A Bond With $1,000 Face Value Paying $100 Coupon Annually That HasSYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SIMULATION-BASED RADIATION ESTIMATION AND PROTECTION FOR MEDICAL PROCEDURES专利检索- ..放射防护例如防护罩专利检索查询-专利查询网Who Originally Had The Idea That Heavy Objects Fell Faster Than Lighter Objects?SiFlux 21-IP-E 50/130-2,2/2-SC-10-T4

• renaming is followed by a list of <identifier> to <identifier>, separated by semicolons, and has the effect of introducing the mentioned identifiers by their new names. An omitted renaming modifier is equivalent to an empty renaming.

For example, the effect of

open A using (xs) renaming (ys to zs)

is to introduce the names xs and zs where xs refers to the same definition as A.xs and zs refers to A.ys. We do not permit xs, ys and zs to overlap.

Explicitly hiding x in a hiding clause and also using x in a using clause or renaming x to y in a renaming clause is an error.A renaming clause can be combined with either a using or a hiding clause.A using and a hiding clause can be combined, but the using clause takes precedence, hiding everything not mentioned, so except for a special situation with modules, there is nothing that the hiding clause can additionally hide.

For submodules of the module being opened, we need to distinguish three situations:

• If M is only a module (and not an object), then use module M to refer to it, and module M to N to rename it. Mentioning just M will be ignored with a warning. For instance,

  open A using (module M)

• If M is only an object (and not a module), then use M to refer to it, and M to N to renaming. Mentioning module M will be ignored with a warning.

• If M is both an object and a module (which happens automatically if M was introduced with a data or record definition), then M affects both the object and the module, unless module M is mentioned separately. In order to introduce only the module, you can write using (module B). In order to introduce only the object, you can write using (B) hiding (module B). In order to introduce all but the module, you can write hiding (module B). It does not seem possible to introduce all but the object: if you write hiding (B) using (module B), then the using clause takes precedence and only module B is introduced.

Since 2.6.1: The fixity of an operator can be set or changed in a renaming directive:

module ExampleRenamingFixity where module ArithFoo where postulate A : Set _&_ _^_ : A → A → A infixr 10 _&_ open ArithFoo renaming (_&_ to infixl 8 _+_; _^_ to infixl 10 _^_)

Here, we change the fixity of _&_ while renaming it to _+_, and assign a new fixity to _^_ which has the default fixity in module ArithFoo.

Re-exporting names¶

A useful feature is the ability to re-export names from another module. For instance, one may want to create a module to collect the definitions from several other modules. This is achieved by qualifying the open statement with the public keyword:

module Example where module Nat₁ where data Nat₁ : Set where zero : Nat₁ suc : Nat₁ → Nat₁ module Bool₁ where data Bool₁ : Set where true false : Bool₁ module Prelude where open Nat₁ public open Bool₁ public isZero : Nat₁ → Bool₁ isZero zero = true isZero (suc _) = false

The module Prelude above exports the names Nat, zero, Bool, etc., in addition to isZero.

Parameterised modules¶

So far, the module system features discussed have dealt solely with scope manipulation. We now turn our attention to some more advanced features.

It is sometimes useful to be able to work temporarily in a given signature. For instance, when defining functions for sorting lists it is convenient to assume a set of list elements A and an ordering over A. In Coq this can be done in two ways: using a functor, which is essentially a function between modules, or using a section. A section allows you to abstract some arguments from several definitions at once. We introduce parameterised modules analogous to sections in Coq. When declaring a module you can give a telescope of module parameters which are abstracted from all the definitions in the module. For instance, a simple implementation of a sorting function looks like this:

module Sort (A : Set)(_≤_ : A → A → Bool) where insert : A → List A → List A insert x [] = x ∷ [] insert x (y ∷ ys) with x ≤ y insert x (y ∷ ys) | true = x ∷ y ∷ ys insert x (y ∷ ys) | false = y ∷ insert x ys sort : List A → List A sort [] = [] sort (x ∷ xs) = insert x (sort xs)

As mentioned parametrising a module has the effect of abstracting the parameters over the definitions in the module, so outside the Sort module we have

Sort.insert : (A : Set)(_≤_ : A → A → Bool) → A → List A → List ASort.sort : (A : Set)(_≤_ : A → A → Bool) → List A → List A

For function definitions, explicit module parameter become explicit arguments to the abstracted function, and implicit parameters become implicit arguments. For constructors, however, the parameters are always implicit arguments. This is a consequence of the fact that module parameters are turned into datatype parameters, and the datatype parameters are implicit arguments to the constructors. It also happens to be the reasonable thing to do.

Something which you cannot do in Coq is to apply a section to its arguments. We allow this through the module application statement. In our example:

module SortNat = Sort Nat leqNat

This will define a new module SortNat as follows

module SortNat where insert : Nat → List Nat → List Nat insert = Sort.insert Nat leqNat sort : List Nat → List Nat sort = Sort.sort Nat leqNat

The new module can also be parameterised, and you can use name modifiers to control what definitions from the original module are applied and what names they have in the new module. The general form of a module application is

module M1 Δ = M2 terms modifiers

A common pattern is to apply a module to its arguments and then open the resulting module. To simplify this we introduce the short-hand

open module M1 Δ = M2 terms [public] mods

for

module M1 Δ = M2 terms modsopen M1 [public]

Splitting a program over multiple files¶

When building large programs it is crucial to be able to split the program over multiple files and to not have to type check and compile all the files for every change. The module system offers a structured way to do this. We define a program to be a collection of modules, each module being defined in a separate file. To gain access to a module defined in a different file you can import the module:

import M

In order to implement this we must be able to find the file in which a module is defined. To do this we require that the top-level module A.B.C is defined in the file C.agda in the directory A/B/. One could imagine instead to give a file name to the import statement, but this would mean cluttering the program with details about the file system which is not very nice.

When importing a module M, the module and its contents are brought into scope as if the module had been defined in the current file. In order to get access to the unqualified names of the module contents it has to be opened. Similarly to module application we introduce the short-hand

open import M

for

import Mopen M

Sometimes the name of an imported module clashes with a local module. In this case it is possible to import the module under a different name.

import M as M’

It is also possible to attach modifiers to import statements, limiting or changing what names are visible from inside the module.Note that modifiers attached to open import statements apply to the open statement and not the import statement.

Datatype modules and record modules¶

When you define a datatype it also defines a module so constructors can now be referred to qualified by their data type.For instance, given:

module DatatypeModules where data Nat₂ : Set where zero : Nat₂ suc : Nat₂ → Nat₂ data Fin : Nat₂ → Set where zero : ∀ {n} → Fin (suc n) suc : ∀ {n} → Fin n → Fin (suc n)

you can refer to the constructors unambiguously as Nat₂.zero, Nat₂.suc, Fin.zero, and Fin.suc (Nat₂ and Fin are modules containing the respective constructors). Example:

inj : (n m : Nat₂) → Nat₂.suc n ≡ suc m → n ≡ minj .m m refl = refl

Previously you had to write something like

inj₁ : (n m : Nat₂) → _≡_ {A = Nat₂} (suc n) (suc m) → n ≡ minj₁ .m m refl = refl

to make the type checker able to figure out that you wanted the natural number suc in this case.

Also record declarations define a corresponding module, seeRecord modules.

References¶

The initial design of Agda 2 module system is coveredin Ulf Norell thesis.

Survey on the module system implementation and its currentsemantics and performance problems was done recently (2023)by Ivar de Bruin.